Template talk:TradeTable: Difference between revisions
Streetclaw (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Streetclaw (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
When I made this template, one of my main goals was to do something about the massive list of trade recipes accompanying every entry on [[Items/Trade]]. But apparently having mw-collapsed elements completely destroys linking to anchor points, because the elements don't collapse until after the page loads at the anchor point. And without that, the template is bigger than the existing list, so it's just going to make the problem worse. Any ideas? [[User:FiRECR0W|FiRECR0W]] ([[User talk:FiRECR0W|talk]]) 05:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | When I made this template, one of my main goals was to do something about the massive list of trade recipes accompanying every entry on [[Items/Trade]]. But apparently having mw-collapsed elements completely destroys linking to anchor points, because the elements don't collapse until after the page loads at the anchor point. And without that, the template is bigger than the existing list, so it's just going to make the problem worse. Any ideas? [[User:FiRECR0W|FiRECR0W]] ([[User talk:FiRECR0W|talk]]) 05:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Fixed --[[User:Streetclaw|Streetclaw]] ([[User talk:Streetclaw|talk]]) 14:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | :Fixed --[[User:Streetclaw|Streetclaw]] ([[User talk:Streetclaw|talk]]) 14:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
==Location Parameter== | |||
I am not a fan of having the location parameter take up a new row on the table. There's nothing really connecting it to the trade listed above, and it could just as easily apply to the one below. Since I added this parameter specifically for when an item requires different trade items in different locations (such as the {{ItemLink|Fruit Set}}), it should be clearly linked to the trade it's used with, which it currently isn't. [[User:FiRECR0W|FiRECR0W]] ([[User talk:FiRECR0W|talk]]) 04:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
:I hope this is better --[[User:Streetclaw|Streetclaw]] ([[User talk:Streetclaw|talk]]) 13:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
::Definitely better, but the spacing of the dashed line seems to vary by column. Maybe if we made that border invisible too, and then added a new border inside the location cell? [[User:FiRECR0W|FiRECR0W]] ([[User talk:FiRECR0W|talk]]) 16:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::Here you go --[[User:Streetclaw|Streetclaw]] ([[User talk:Streetclaw|talk]]) 17:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:37, 26 February 2016
When I made this template, one of my main goals was to do something about the massive list of trade recipes accompanying every entry on Items/Trade. But apparently having mw-collapsed elements completely destroys linking to anchor points, because the elements don't collapse until after the page loads at the anchor point. And without that, the template is bigger than the existing list, so it's just going to make the problem worse. Any ideas? FiRECR0W (talk) 05:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed --Streetclaw (talk) 14:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Location Parameter
I am not a fan of having the location parameter take up a new row on the table. There's nothing really connecting it to the trade listed above, and it could just as easily apply to the one below. Since I added this parameter specifically for when an item requires different trade items in different locations (such as the Fruit Set), it should be clearly linked to the trade it's used with, which it currently isn't. FiRECR0W (talk) 04:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- I hope this is better --Streetclaw (talk) 13:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Definitely better, but the spacing of the dashed line seems to vary by column. Maybe if we made that border invisible too, and then added a new border inside the location cell? FiRECR0W (talk) 16:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Here you go --Streetclaw (talk) 17:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Definitely better, but the spacing of the dashed line seems to vary by column. Maybe if we made that border invisible too, and then added a new border inside the location cell? FiRECR0W (talk) 16:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)